Sunday, 22 July 2012

Can Murder be Justified?

by Salma Rana
police line, murder, economics for teens, economics for teenagers, teenage economist, teen economist
This question may seem rather straightforward and you may initially find yourself leaning towards ‘No, murder cannot be justified’ because all in all, it is not acceptable to take away someone else’s chance at life. Right?  However, when you look at the bigger picture you find that it is more complicated than that because of the various degrees to murder and really, what is classified as murder and what makes it justified? 


Killing animals, war and capital punishment are murderous situations but they have happened in the past and will continue to happen in the future and seem to be completely justified by many.

The headline “No charge for father who killed daughter's rapist”  has been around in the media for the past few weeks and has definitely raised some interesting issues concerning ethics and human rights.
village, texas, economics for teens, economics for teenagers, teenage economist, teen economist 
The father and daughter are left anonymous in order to protect their identities. A quick overview of the case is that, on June 9th, a Texas dad found his five year old daughter being sexually assaulted by a rapist, and consequently beat the attacker to death. The father was not charged and, although investigated for homicide, the jury were very quick to come to this conclusion.

The fact that they were very quick in deciding this ultimately questions, as extreme as it sounds, whether murder can ever be justified.

I have a relativist view of this and personally think that in this case, it can.

Everyone has their own rights, but I believe that because and when the attacker raped an innocent young girl -and could have potentially killed her- he lost those rights.   

While some are concerned about the fact that a killer is let off, they may not be aware of the full circumstances. Put yourself in the father's position. You hear that your daughter has been abducted and then you follow her screams, only to find her being treated in the worst possible way imaginable. Do you just stand there and wait for the police to arrive or do you do everything in your power to get your daughter away from the man? The answer seems straight forward, and it is.

Some say that the father could have just taken his daughter and left, but then that would leave the rapist free to commit similar crimes. So while he beat up the attacker, in a fit of rage- he did, in affect, protect potential future victims.

What I think to be one of the most important factors and greatly justified the homicide was that he didn't mean or want the attacker to die. He even called the police himself when the realised that the man was dying. He then arranged an ambulance. 

"I need help. This guy is dying on me... oh my god... I'm going to try to load him up on the truck and take him to the hospital." He sobbed into the phone. 

I do not think that the rights of the rapist are relevant anymore because on top of the injuries left on the five-year old girl, we need to consider her mental health. Now this experience has probably tainted her life and left her quite distressed, when once she would have felt completely safe. She will need time to recover. Moreover, the father himself did not mean to kill the attacker and therefore will have to live the rest of his life knowing that he did.

It seems that war, animal testing and capital punishment are just as justified as this case. In fact, this case may be even more justified because the three above are cases where murder has been completely intentional whereas (and reiterating this) the father did not intend to commit murder. And looking back, capital punishment is seen as a form of self- defense because you are protecting “the people” and in this case the father has also protected “the people”.

So, what to do think? Can murder ever be justified? Was is ethical and acceptable for the father not to be charged, at all? And what makes murder acceptable? 

body, police line, murder, economics for teens, economics for teenagers, teenage economist, teen economist




If you enjoyed this article, why not subscribe?


Subscribe by email to The Teen Economists 


(We won't share your email address with anyone, we promise!)


13 comments:

  1. Very interesting article, and it raises some important ethical questions. However, what do you think about the idea that justifying some kinds of murder could allow murderers and antisocial people to believe that actually, they can justify their actions in some way, too? I'm saying this to spark off some sort of philosophical debate :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you! :)
    That's a really really good point and ultimately a disadvantage for cancelling out the death penalty. I think that no one has the right to decide if someone lives or not but then if this works in the favour of murderers and they can come up with an excuse to justify their actions- this would create more problems and it is better to take the murder out of the equation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Brilliant article, Salma! But in response to John's point, haven't most murderers justified their actions in their heads anyway? I've just checked out the stats for UK criminals re-offending, and the figure is about 26%. So doesn't this just suggest that murderers and other criminals seem to have justified their actions to themselves already?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree and have mixed feelings on both sides. I think that if I personally was in the act of a shooting and someone was holding a gun at my face and I had a gun I wouldn't think about murder I would think about staying safe and staying alive so I would probably shoot.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This article was very interesting. I agree completely because it was wrong for the rapist to do that. I imagine myself somewhere where someone was pointing a gun at me.That would be unfair if i didn't have my own weapon. Hopefully, i can learn more about this topic soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you didn't have your own weapon, which the victim normally doesn't, sure, it would be unfair. But, life isn't fair, and you probably won't to need to worry about life not being fair if you're in that situation....

      Delete
  6. I think the father had a father's intention. That intention is to protect his children. Think of a mother bear and her cubs. The black bear doesn't usually attack. The only time the species attacks is when it's a mother or father protecting her young. If you got between her and her baby, you might suffer some fatal scars. If you leave them alone, and stay out of the way, they is most likely to leave you alone too. I know my mother would do anything to protect me. So would my father. It's a parent's instinct. So I think in some cases, it can be justified.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have very mixed feelings about this article. I could go both ways, not knowing much detail about this event. I don't know the family's situation but if I were to be the father in this event I would of done the same thing as the real father of the kid. If you have the book The Outsiders this is like when Johnny kills Bob in the park. I recommend reading this book it is an outstanding well written book by a teen.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have many mixed feelings about this topic. If you kill someone for revenge for something that happened ten years ago or if the person you killed pulled in front of you on the highway, then it is pointless to take someone else's life because your mad. if you kill someone because their attacking or killing someone else then I guess it could be justified. No matter if you kill some one for revenge or to protect some one, there is always a an alternative solution to stop someone from hurting someone else. sometimes it can be ridicules what people kill because or for. All and all I think murder is an excuse for taking your anger out on others.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree completely. Anyone who commits a terrible enough crime, like the one featured here in this blog, has their rights taken away. They're no longer protected by the law. In this case, murder can be justified. Unfortunately, most times it can't. Most cases of murder have a motive that doesn't really require murder or anything else, yet it happens. I hope most future cases of murder have a reasonable motive and can be justified. But, if the motive is not reasonable or is not there at all, murder can't be justified.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I've got mixed feelings about this. I mean, on one hand, he KILLED a person! But on the other, his five-year-old daughter was ABDUCTED, and he found her being RAPED! I believe everyone has rights. But the guy LOST them when he abducted and tried to rape the little kid. In a similar fashion, Bonnie (technically) murdered Lysandre, but it's seen as OK because he was trying to destroy the world. (This is in Pokémon XYZ. It's OK if you don't get it.) Then there's the fact that he didn't actually MEAN to kill the guy. Overall, murder CAN be justified, but only with the right conditions.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think that in this case, it was justified. The girl was getting attacked and the father just wanted to save her. The father didn't even mean to kill the person. This is kind of like in the book the outsiders when Johnny kills Bob to save his friend, Ponyboy. If it is self defense or to protect someone then it is somewhat okay.

    ReplyDelete

Hi there!

We'd love it if you'd share your thoughts and ideas. Don't forget to check back after commenting because we try to reply to all of your comments.

Just remember to be nice, please!

:)

ShareThis